Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction to the Problem: The execution of condemnatory civil judgments in the Pekalongan District Court faces resistance, resulting in stagnation at the implementation level. This problem is underpinned by the actions of the execution respondents, which conceptually align with Contempt of Court.
Purpose/Study Objectives: This article aims to analyze actions identified as forms of Contempt of Court during execution in the Pekalongan District Court and efforts to minimize such actions.
Novelty: In the Pekalongan District Court, the concept can be conceptually classified as Contempt of Court, an angle that has received little focused attention in Indonesian judicial research.
Methodology: By employing normative-empirical research and based on qualitative descriptive analysis, this article concludes that there is interference in the administration of justice in the form of non-compliance with aanmaning (warning) and unlawful physical resistance cumulatively carried out by the execution respondents, which is inherently related to the doctrine of Contempt of Court from a conceptual perspective, and contrary to the Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR).
Results/Findings: Minimizing Contempt of Court involving state security elements and proposing the drafting of legislation related to Contempt of Court that accommodates actions, behaviors, attitudes, and/or statements that can undermine the authority, dignity, and honor of the judiciary.

Keywords

Contempt of Court Execution Condemnatory Civil Judgment State Security Eelements Minimization Efforts

Article Details

How to Cite
Avicenna, M. F., & Latifiani, D. (2025). Minimizing Contempt of Court in Condemnatory Civil Judgment Execution (Case Study of Pekalongan District Court). Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 10(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.24198/jbmh.v10i1.1791

References

Read More